# ===== To use the email review form, remove all lines above this one! ==== # # # # IF YOU PLAN TO SUBMIT YOUR REVIEWS USING THIS TEMPLATE, PLEASE DO # # SO WITH CARE TO EASE THE AUTOMATIC PROCESSING OF YOUR REVIEWS. IF # # YOU HAVE CO-REVIEWERS, PLEASE FORWARD THESE INSTRUCTIONS TO THEM. # # # # ========================================================================= # # # Sections 1 to 4 are in the following format: # 1) Question # 2) Possible answers # 3) What to fill in after the keyword on the keyword-line # 4) KEYWORD: # # Sections 5 to 8 are meant to # - write a summary of the paper; # - write comments for the program committee (which will NOT be sent to # the authors); # - write comments for the authors (which will be sent to them after the # PC meeting); # - write arguments in favour or against the paper. # # Section 9 is meant for the names of your co-reviewer(s). # # You may use more than one line for the answers of sections 5 to 9. # # The lines that MUST be in the email are the lines that contain the # CAPITALIZED keywords. All lines starting with the '#'-character will # be discarded, so you may either leave them as they are or remove them # for any reason you can think of. # # The first keyword of a review form is REVIEWER-NAME. # The last line of a review is the line '%%%% END OF FORM %%%%'. # # You may submit more than one review per email message. To do so, copy # the lines including and between the keywords REVIEWER-NAME # and %%%% END OF FORM %%%% and paste them after the end-of-form marker # of the previous review." # # Don't change the following 2 lines: REVIEWER-NAME: Some Name REVIEWER-NUMBER: 8 # # (Fill in after the keyword: 1 to 30) PAPER-NUMBER: # # 1 - How do you classify this paper? # A: I will champion this paper at the PC meeting # (advocate/accept). # B: I can accept this paper, but I will not champion it # (accept, but could reject). # C: This paper should be rejected, though I will not fight strongly # against it (reject, but could accept). # D: Serious problems. I will argue to reject this paper # (detractor). # (Fill in after the keyword: A, B, C or D) CLASSIFICATION: # # 2 - What is your overall expertise concerning the subject areas of # this paper? # X: I am an expert; # Y: I am knowledgable in the area, though not an expert; # Z: I am not an expert. My evaluation is that of an informed outsider. # (Fill in after the keyword: X, Y or Z) REVIEWER-EXPERTISE: # # 3 - Is the paper a full paper or a short paper? # 1: Full # 2: Short # 3: Other? # (Fill in after the keyword: 1, 2 or 3) PAPER-TYPE: # # 4 - Summary of the paper: # (Type after or below the keyword) SUMMARY: # # 5 - Comments for the committee only (Not shown to the author(s)): # (Type after or below the keyword) COMMITTEE-COMMENTS: # # 6 - Comments for the author(s) - will be sent to the submitters: # (Type after or below the keyword) AUTHOR-COMMENTS: # # 7 - Points in favour or against # (Type after or below the keyword) POINTS-IN-FAVOUR-AGAINST: # # 8 - Co-reviewer(s) for this paper: # (One line per co-reviewer; leave blank if none) CO-REVIEWERS: # # To include the next review, copy all lines of the review form, so # including and between REVIEWER-NAME: and %%%% END OF FORM %%%%, # and paste them below the next line. %%%% END OF FORM %%%%